Menu:

Latest news:

July 10, 2006
New Stuff!
♥Latest photo feature from photoblog
♥New Blogroll
♥Collapsed archive list to a menu

June 4, 2006
Launched new Photoblog!

April 12, 2006
"Read More" links introduced!

March 16, 2006
Added Google Ads. Support this blog, click an ad!

December 14, 2005
New design!

Previous Posts:

A weekend of Poker
Money!
An Anniversary
Holidays go by too fast
Merry Christmas!
Why you should continue to date me ...
Work work
Poker Satellite!
Narnia
Blog Revamped!

Latest Photo:

Random Links:

My Blogger Profile
Site Atom feed
My Del.icio.us Links

Poker Links:

Poker Source Online
Free Stuff From PSO
Instant Bankroll

Web Comics

Bob the Angry Flower
Ctrl+Alt+Del
Dilbert
FoxTrot
Penny Arcade
PvPonline
Questionable Content
Sinfest
VG Cats

Blogroll

Casino Ownage
Madeleine
Mike J.
owhite
Paul
Ry-Jazz Digest

Powered by Blogger

Version: 1.3
(July 10, 2006)

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

TV Shopping

Well I've started to go into the full swing of Television shopping. There seems to be a dazzling array of options out there, and its tough because I'm not really sure how much I should spend. So I figure if I post my options, one of a couple things might happen.
  1. By typing out the options that I have, I can more easily weight the pros and cons of my potential decision.
  2. If someone is actually reading this and has an opinion they can post a comment saying what they think.
So here are the options I can choose from.
  1. Basic CRT Tube Television, No HD capabilities
  2. CRT Tube Television with HD capabilities
  3. Small LCD Television (26-27")
  4. Larger LCD Television (30-32")
Option 1
The cheapest option and one which makes the best fiscal sense is the simplest, and cheapest option. Unfortunately, this option also lacks the features of future television viewing. HD capability is all the rage at the moment - and while I don't have an HD source just yet I don't doubt that I'll get one in the near future.

An option like this will cost up to $500 for a TV up to 32" in size. The TV would be a behemoth as any CRT TV greater than 27" in size is way more than a single person can lift and move.

Option 2
The next option is to get one of the few HDTV enabled CRT TVs. While more expensive than the non-HDTV CRTs, these TVs give the most future video viewing pleasure for the buck. While not as sleek and sexy as the LCD options, this is significantly easier on the pocket book. There is also a hidden advantage to the CRT HDTV in that LCDs still cannot display true black colour very well. But CRT TVs do not suffer from the same problem.

This option will cost roughly $1000 for a 30-32" TV. Less is possible with a 27" model from Toshiba. There aren't a lot of options in this category, but they tend to be cheaper than their LCD cousins.

Option 3
Option 3 is where we get to the fancy stuff - the sleek, sexy LCD monitor. As an aside, I don't really want to consider plasma screens as they are mostly offered in screensizes larger than my living room really justifies, and to my knowledge they are largely affected by image burn-in. So that leaves LCD technology which is really starting to take over it seems. I'm really really tempted to get one. The price on these beauties are really starting to come down which means I can possibly afford to pick one up. This is category one - the smaller LCD TV ranging up to the 26-27" range of television. My major concern is that some of the cheaper LCDs may not have the picture quality to justify purchasing them even at their cheaper price. The more expensive brands seem to be a lot better, but they're also rather expensive.

The price points for these TVs range quite a bit, but I've seen TVs reasonably cost in the $1000-$1200 range.

Option 4
Oh these are sweet. 30-32" of awesome screen space, but very thin and light in comparison to comparably sized CRT screens. The downside is the price. So the question is ... are these worth the high higher sticker price?

The lowest price I've seen these come is $1300 and they go up well over $2000. You're paying a lot for brand name and quality of the LCD screen I think. But its hard to say - I need to look at a lot more of these especially since if I pay for something here, I'm really looking for the screen to last me a looooong time.

Other Considerations
My living room really isn't big enough to house a screen larger than 32" so that's what I'm looking at. A smaller screen might be a better option if it carries a nice lower price tag since then I can make it a secondary TV when I move to a place that can house a larger screen. I want something of quality that will last several years, wherever it is housed.

Thoughts? There's a lot more running through my mind with this issue, but that's kinda what I've got so far. The world of TVs is a vast and confusing place I'm finding. Ugh.

Heraldk

2 Comments:

  • At 11:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Not that I'm completely up to date on everything TV but here's my two cents.

    I definitely would make sure my TV is HD capable ... more and more channels are going this way, it'll be the norm soon. Be ready for the complete revolution ahead of time ... TVs last a while (unless you have an accident) so I'd go for the future payoff.

    27" vs 32"? My 27" suits me just fine and my room is just slightly shorter than yours for viewing. It's also a large enough size that four people can play (Xbox) on the screen without being too cramped.

    I had the opportunity to play with an LCD screen for a couple days. Definitely agree with the non-true black ... but depending on distance I found that the eye picked it up differently (less when you were further away and depending on viewing angle). Really crisp images and I definitely enjoyed the fact that I could tote it around myself instead of begging a favour off a muscular man.

    So ... after that ... I would suggest going for a HD capable, LCD screen (mid-grade to high-grade quality) with whichever screen size you want.

     
  • At 11:02 AM, Blogger Herald said…

    Thanks for the comments :)

    I actually decided on a new TV (will be posting about it shortly) - its pretty sweet !

     

Post a Comment

<< Home